America's asthma and pulmonary patients sincerely thank the following honest, brave medical professionals who have come forward to tell the truth about the greatest medical betrayal of patients in U.S. history: the medically and scientifically unjustifiable ban of CFC inhalers. We know that there are many more of you out there; please stand up for your patients and send us your quotes at sponsor@SaveCFCInhalers.org
Comments From Medical Professionals:
"I occasionally have bronchospasm after I get a cold, and I personally can say that the HFA version of albuterol doesn't work. My patients say the same thing. How CFC inhalers were banned and more expensive, less effective medications substituted for dependent patients is beyond me. Dr. Howard Schulman, RI #4916
“Many say that they feel like the inhaler isn't delivering the medicine.”
Dr. Mario Castro, pulmonologist and associate professor of medicine for Washington University's School of Medicine, December 29, 2008
"During my twenty five years of practicing medicine, I have had occasion to treat hundreds of asthmatics, from mild cases to severe cases requiring hospitalization. I can report that during this time, I had many patients who responded better to the CFC inhalers than to the HFA inhalers. The relief response was faster and more pronounced, and these patients were much more satisfied with the CFC inhalers.
"Fifteen years ago, I developed the sudden onset of adult asthma, which was frequently severe to the point of crisis, requiring oxygen as well as injections of epinephrine and steroids. I feel that the CFC inhalers provide faster and longer lasting relief from difficult breathing than the HFA inhalers.
"The amount of CFC’s released into the atmosphere by the MDI's from asthmatics is trivial in comparison to the numerous other causes of contamination, and to withhold an effective therapy for one who feels suffocated and unable to breathe is callous and grossly misdirected. Many physicians feel that there is an emotional component to the causation of asthma. Even if studies claim that the two types of inhalers are of equal effectiveness, to deny to an asthmatic in crisis the medication he or she feels is more effective is cruel and might well aggravate the asthmatic symptoms instead of providing the treatment (i.e. CFC’s) the asthmatic person feels is more effective.
"CFC’s are not available because of the influence of medically untrained persons prevailing upon the legislature to ban them from the marketplace. It has been widely noticed that when a patented drug’s patent protection expires, and cheap generics become widely available, the manufacturer of said patent medication immediately produces a new patent-protected medication said to produce much better clinical results. Note that universally, the new medication is considerably more expensive than the former patented drug, and many times more expensive than the generic version.
"I ask you: could the ban of the CFC’s be the result of the well-paid pharmaceutical lobbyists in Washington bending the ears of our politicians to convince them of the great risk to the environment by the asthmatics’ use of their life-giving CFC inhalers? Once that is done, it will open the doors of the pharmaceutical manufacturers to a renewed flow of profits that would otherwise have remained closed to them.
"During their time in the practice of medicine, many of my colleagues have become skeptical, even cynical of the motivations of many of the pharmaceutical manufacturers. Having witnessed at close hand much of this machination, I have to say that their views are, more often than not, well founded." Robert Krogh, M.D., by email, January 22, 2009